Yealink Forums
T46 (maybe others) password requirements - Printable Version

+- Yealink Forums (http://forum.yealink.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Video Collaboration (/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: VP530 (/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: T46 (maybe others) password requirements (/showthread.php?tid=635)



T46 (maybe others) password requirements - CWR - 07-16-2013 12:11 AM

We have started uing the T46's and noticced the password can no longer be numeric only or alpha only Why the change? Maybe you give the admin a choice on the password requirements...


RE: T46 (maybe others) password requirements - briankelly63 - 07-16-2013 02:26 AM

second that! The manufacturer of a phone should not be setting password requirements!


RE: T46 (maybe others) password requirements - CWR - 07-23-2013 01:50 AM

and why is it form based auth and not pop-up auth like the T38? It breaks a lot of my functionality.


RE: T46 (maybe others) password requirements - Yealink Support - 07-23-2013 02:38 PM

Hello all,
Sorry for this, let me submit this issue to related guys. Any update will let you know ASAP.


RE: T46 (maybe others) password requirements - timalex - 08-07-2014 01:28 AM

@craigreilly: The pwd issue unclear to me. Using T46G's with 28.72.0.25/26, I can change the password to "abcdef" or "123456" without any problem.
And just to maybe get a new idea what's possible (or, in this case, ...not...): What kind of functionality is broken by form based auth? Thx.


RE: T46 (maybe others) password requirements - CWR - 09-02-2014 12:58 PM

(08-07-2014 01:28 AM)timalex Wrote:  @craigreilly: The pwd issue unclear to me. Using T46G's with 28.72.0.25/26, I can change the password to "abcdef" or "123456" without any problem.
And just to maybe get a new idea what's possible (or, in this case, ...not...): What kind of functionality is broken by form based auth? Thx.


Please note this is over a year old and fixed by the manufacturer.
As far as forms based authentication - it would not crept http://username:password@phoneip to do some of its cgi functionality. This again is no longer an issue..